Every complex society has a dilemma to solve—wealth and power tend to concentrate until the divide between haves and have-nots threaten the social fabric. Some Native American cultures have massive give-aways (potlatches) in which the giver is honored and all benefit from the largesse. The prophets of the Old Testament also cried out for redistribution
Agrarian life is full of risks: drought, flooding,
infestation, and other natural disasters, capped throughout antiquity
by wars. Farmers must often borrow to get themselves through the lean
months, while hoping that nothing prevents them from bringing in crops
that will allow them to repay their debts. In ancient times, failure to
repay loans could cost farmers their land, possessions, enslavement of
family members, or their own freedom. For millennia, the problem
confronting rulers was how to prevent the destabilization that occurs
when large portions of the population are forced off the land or into
debtor's prison for failure to repay loans.
And so
there developed throughout the ancient Near East a tradition of
clean-slate edicts, which “proclaimed justice” or decreed “economic
order” and “righteousness” by canceling debts and restoring forfeited
land to farmers. Clean-slate proclamations date from almost as early as
the first interest-bearing debt, starting in Sumer around 2400 years
BCE. Eventually, the tradition became known as the Jubilee Year, but by
that time it was taken out of the hands of kings and placed at the core
of Mosaic law.
Radical as the idea of the Jubilee
seems to modern eyes, these “restorations of order” were a conservative
tradition in Bronze Age Mesopotamia for 2,000 years. What was conserved
was self-sufficiency for the rural family-heads who made up the
infantry as well as the productive base of Near Eastern economies.
Conversely, what was radically disturbing in archaic times was the idea
of unrestrained wealth-seeking. It took thousands of years for the idea
of progress to become inverted, to connote irreversible freedom for the
wealthy to deprive the peasantry of their lands and personal liberty.
The
clean-slate tradition was so central to Israelite moral values that it
framed the composition of both the Old and New Testaments. Yet so far
has the modern idea of market efficiency and progress gone that today,
although the Bible remains our civilization's defining book, its
economic laws are rarely taken seriously. The Ten Commandments and
Golden Rule have become so dissociated from the economic legislation of
Exodus, Leviticus, and Deuteronomy that whoever takes these laws in
earnest is considered utopian and anachronistic. Yet these laws formed
the take-off point for Jesus upon his return to Nazareth's synagogue
and for his denunciation of the money-changers who had taken over
Jerusalem's temple. As recently as medieval Spain, the tradition of the
Jubilee Year was kept alive by the Jewish sages Maimonides and Ibn
Adret. To dismiss these laws is thus to remove much of the Bible from
the context of its times.
Laws that periodically
canceled debts, freed Israelite debt-servants, and returned lands to
their traditional holders have confused Biblical students for
centuries. They have long been virtually ignored by historians on the
ground that, to modern eyes, they would seem to wreak economic havoc.
Recent
discoveries of Bronze Age Near Eastern royal proclamations dating from
2400 to 1600 BCE leave no doubt that these edicts were implemented.
During the Babylonian period they grew more elaborate and detailed,
capped by Ammisaduqa's Edict of 1646 BCE. Now that these edicts are
understood, the Biblical laws no longer stand alone as utopian or
other-worldly ideals; they take their place in a 2,000-year continuum
of periodic and regular economic renewal based on freedom from
debt-servitude and from the loss of access to self-support on the land.
The revolutionary Israelite contribution to the
tradition was its removal from the hands of rulers to become a sacred
popular compact, to be preserved by the Israelites in memory of the
fact that they had once been enslaved and must never again permit
economic oppression to develop. The Israelites are portrayed as having
made a covenant to protect the economically weak by holding the land as
the Lord's gift to support a free rural population: “Land must not be
sold in perpetuity, for the land belongs to me, and you are only
strangers and guests. You will allow a right of redemption on all your
landed property,” and restore it to its customary cultivators every 50
years (Lev. 25:23-28). Israelite debt-slaves likewise were to go free
periodically in the Jubilee Year, for they belonged ultimately to the
Lord, not to any person (Lev. 25:54).
The Bible is a
unique composite, embedding ritual traditions and laws of social
behavior in a dramatic context of stories and legends intended to
appeal to the widest possible audience. This popularization was greatly
aided by the spread of alphabetic writing, which made documents
accessible to the population at large, in contrast to cumbersome
syllabic cuneiforms prevalent prior to the first millennium BCE. But
the great innovation was to democratize liturgical texts that earlier
Near Eastern societies had restricted to temple priesthoods. Deut.
31:10 directs that the laws be read aloud publicly every seven years,
in the year of canceling debts (shemitta), so that all the population
would know they were to be freed from bondage.
Jesus
later sought to restore the archaic ethic by overturning the banking
tables in Jerusalem's temple and preaching anew the promise of Jeremiah
to proclaim equity and liberty (deror) throughout the land. Indeed, it
was specifically on this principle of restoring freedom to debt-slaves
and unburdening the land that Christianity elaborated its ideas of
redemption. In addition to redeeming souls, early Christians redeemed
their co-religionists from worldly bondage. When Handel staged the
first performance of his Messiah in Dublin in 1742, it was no
coincidence that the proceeds were used to free debtors from prison.
For thousands of years, redeeming people and land from debt was the
primary and most concrete form of redemption. Indeed, when Christians
pronounce “Hallelujah,” they repeat the ritual term alulu, chanted upon
the freeing of Babylonian debt-slaves.
Echoes of the
doctrine can also be heard in American tradition. The Liberty Bell in
Philadelphia is inscribed with a quotation from Leviticus 25:10:
“Proclaim liberty throughout all the land, and to all the inhabitants
thereof.” The Hebrew word translated as “liberty” is deror, cognate to
the older Akkadian andurarum—to move freely as running water, as freely
as debt-slaves liberated to rejoin their families. The full verse in
Leviticus speaks of freeing debt bondsmen and freeing the land from
debt generally: “Hallow the fiftieth year, and proclaim liberty
throughout all the land and to all inhabitants thereof; it shall be a
Jubilee unto you; and ye shall return every man unto his family.”
Rome
was the first society not to cancel its debts. And we all know what
happened to it. Classical historians such as Plutarch, Livy, and
Diodorus attributed Rome's decline and fall to the fact that creditors
got the entire economy in their debt, expropriated the land and public
domain, and strangled the economy.
Michael Hudson is distinguished research professor of economics at the University of Missouri, Kansas City, and author of Super Imperialism: The Economic Strategy of American Empire(new
edition forthcoming November 2002). This article is based on
“Reconstructing the Origins of Interest-Bearing Debt and the Logic of
Clean Slates,” in Debt and Economic Renewal in the Ancient Near East, by Michael Hudson and Marc Van De Mieroop.
Reprints/Reposts :: Contact Us :: 206-842-0216 :: Toll-Free Subscriptions 1-800-937-4451
YES! is published by the Positive Futures Network, 284 Madrona Way NE, Ste 116, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110-2870