Sections
Home » YES! Blogs » David Korten » Who Really Crashed the Economy?

YES! I want to try YES!
Magazine.
YES! by Email
Join over 62,000 others already signed up for FREE YES! news.
[SAMPLE]  [ARCHIVE]
YES! This Week email logo
Sign up for our weekly highlights email. 

David Korten's Agenda for a New Economy: 3 Ways to Get the Book

Posters ad (generic)

Hot or Cold: the YES! Klean Kanteen

 

Who Really Crashed the Economy?

Posted by David Korten at Sep 11, 2009 04:15 PM |

And why do we keep blaming the wrong people?

Mobs disrupt town meetings. Glenn Beck amplifies a careless remark by a mid-level White House staff member into a threat of a national communist takeover. The right wing spin machine creates a parent revolt over a presidential pep talk to students urging them to study hard and stay in school. Meanwhile, the Party of No blocks action on health care and climate disruption with lies and distortions and declares President Obama’s stimulus package a socialist plot and a failed waste of taxpayer money.

There is a common thread. Each of these media events has diverted attention from Wall Street’s responsibility for crashing the economy, taking trillions of dollars in public bailout money, and then rewarding itself with outlandish bonuses.

The Wall Street corporations funding the front organizations that orchestrate these and other diversions hope we will forget that America’s number one problem is Wall Street—and the overpaid Wall Street casino gamblers who destroyed our economy in a reckless test of the theory that markets can self-regulate and that the unrestrained pursuit of individual greed is beneficial to society.

Wall Street’s greatest fear is that the public might demand Congress and the president shut down the casino. Any issue that shifts attention away from Wall Street and pins the blame for job loss and mortgage foreclosures on President Obama works in its favor.

The right wing media campaign would have us believe that President Obama, not Wall Street, is the nation’s #1 problem. He’s a socialist. He’s an irresponsible spender. He isn’t really patriotic (remember, he didn’t wear a flag pin). America’s lost jobs and the mortgage foreclosures are his doing. Never mind that he was still living in Chicago working as a civil rights lawyer and then an Illinois state senator while Wall Street was putting together the high-risk financial instruments that ultimately brought down the economy.

Every controversy that gains media attention, including such peripheral issues as President Obama’s talk to students and a green jobs advisor who once signed a controversial petition, helps to push Wall Street off the front page and distract the White House, congress, and the public from the real issue.

Van Jones HH Award

Van Jones accepts the 2009 Hubert Humphrey Award for "selfless and devoted service in the cause of equality."

Photo courtesy of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights

Because Van Jones, the green jobs advisor who was the object of a withering smear campaign funded by the corporate right, is a valued friend and colleague, I followed the outlandish attack on him with far greater attention than I normally give to the right wing noise machine. I watched in amazement as it elevated him from being a mid-level White House advisor to being one of the most powerful and dangerous players in Washington, the leader of a socialist plot to take over America. Van was a perfect surrogate for Obama, because he is a charismatic black man with a gift for oratory similar to Obama’s—and is an outspoken advocate of social justice and environmental responsibility.

Van’s message is one that I should think any loyal, caring, thoughtful American would celebrate. Yet I watched as Glenn Beck in full red-faced bluster translated a video clip of Van Jones calling on his audience to be more caring in our relationships with one another into a subversive plot to turn America into a socialist state. I was aghast. Would Beck have condemned Jesus as a socialist and cheered those who led him off to his crucifixion?

Much of my academic training is in psychology. As a student, I was fascinated by studies of the psychological dynamics that allowed Hitler to take control of Germany and more generally lead people to enthusiastically support racist, fear-mongering, authoritarian demagogues. There is a general pattern. Successful demagogues provide a message of certainty in uncertain times that turns fear and self-doubt into a sense of purpose, power, and self-worth for people called to join an army of the righteous to rid the world of some real or imagined evil.

Another of my African-American colleagues, Harry Pickens, recently shared with me his compelling assessment of how this dynamic is playing out currently in America.

He notes that most Americans, until quite recently, grew up within a culture that assigned each of us our place in a social hierarchy that placed men over women, whites over people of color, rich people over poor people, and humans over nature. Knowing one's place offered a certain sense of stability and security even for those on the bottom.

Unless one has a secure sense of identity independent of these categories, the breakdown of the hierarchy can introduce extreme uncertainty that is both confusing and threatening, even in times of economic prosperity. The civil rights, women's, and environmental movements all challenged the hierarchy and threatened the established system of authority and identity.

Then came the ultimate shock—a black president whose intelligence, poise, talent, and charisma set him apart even from most of America’s former presidents. With him came the strong, intelligent, beautiful, and charming Michelle, who has the potential, like Hillary Clinton, to be a future presidential candidate in her own right. Horror of horrors. The only thing that might present a greater threat to the old social order than a black male president from a modest class background is the specter of a black female president. For some it has been a shock too great to bear.

That is the backdrop of the withering smear attack on Van, a refreshingly honest and mature voice filled with wisdom and insight into the possibility of America as a strong, caring, environmentally responsible, multiracial nation. Those of us on the progressive side who have transcended our old identities and are psychologically ready to hear and celebrate his message are, in fact, thrilled that the message comes from a black man who is speaking on behalf of all people of every gender, race, and class.

It is sometimes difficult for progressives to understand just how inherently threatening our message can be to those whose sense of identity depends on clinging to their position in the collapsing hierarchy of power and privilege. Even if we call only for a world of love for all people and all beings, skilled propaganda masters of the right easily take our words and spin them in a way that make them feel threatening to their followers. Of course Van's language is not so restrictive, and appropriately so. His honesty without malice or blame is why we love him and look to him as a leader.

We on the progressive side best respond by being strong and centered in the artful manner of Joanna Macy's Shambhala warrior, deflecting the thrusts of the forces of hateful violence in ways that disarm them without responding in kind.

I believe the culture is shifting at a deeper level. Ever more people are awakening to the possibilities of a world beyond the old social ordering, a world that truly fulfills the American ideal of liberty and justice for all, and they are redefining their personal identities accordingly. The shift is only partially visible, however, because those who navigate it are less inclined to respond in kind to the voices of fear and hate and thus get less media attention.

I believe the shift is destined to accelerate, because the brains of all but the most severely psychologically damaged humans are hard-wired to care and connect. Many of those who go along with the culture of hate and fear do so simply because it is their only experience. We best reach them by demonstrating the possibilities of a different way of being and relating.

All the while, we need to maintain a clear focus on Wall Street as the primary source of the economic, social, political, and environmental crises that threaten our long-term security and viability as a nation. To resolve the crises, we must strip Wall Street of its power and bring forth a New Economy designed to serve the needs of people and nature rather than simply profits. Among other things, this requires legislative action to break up the big Wall Street financial institutions, strictly limit financial speculation, and bar corporations from usurping the political rights of persons. We cannot allow Wall Street to succeed in its effort to put the blame on President Obama and divert our attention to a continuing series of diversionary issues. 


David Korten is co-founder and board chair of YES! magazine, co-chair of the New Economy Working Group, and president of the People-Centered Development Forum. His books include Agenda for a New Economy: From Phantom Wealth to Real Wealth, The Great Turning: From Empire to Earth Community, and the international best seller When Corporations Rule the World.

Reader Comments

Fear at the bottom

Posted by Sam Hess at Sep 16, 2009 10:50 AM
I first formally encountered a hierarchical list of states of being that define human behavior in Dr. David R. Hawkins' POWER VS. FORCE. In his list, SHAME is at the bottom, and ENLIGHTENMENT at the top. I have since encountered other similar lists from authors attempting to explain human consciousness and activities. One thing they all have in common is that FEAR is a more uncomfortable (lower) state of being than ANGER. I invite you observe, as I have done, how you feel when when you are afraid and when you are angry. Rational or irrational, ANGER is less painful and more empowering than FEAR.

I don't know if the corporate puppeteers are aware of such hierarchies, but they have certainly put them to good use in pulling the strings of fearful people, sending them to town hall meetings and "tea parties" to shout absurdities. Moving beyond ANGER to REASON is difficult when one is being manipulated by entities that stand to lose when critical thinking is employed.

Who Really Crashed The Economy

Posted by CW at Sep 16, 2009 10:51 AM
Let's not forget the large national builders, traded on the NYSE, who not only over built, had their own mortgage companies, and in some cases appraisers.

Federal lawsuits filed recently against eight large production builders in California blame them for creating neighborhoods where high foreclosure rates have caused home values to plummet, wiping out the investments of many home buyers.

All eight lawsuits are seeking to become national class action cases, representing buyers who put 20% or more down on homes in the builders' neighborhoods across the country.

The lawsuits allege that the builders' practices in recent years of controlling every step of the home buying process, through appraisals and issuing loans through their finance companies, created an environment where there was no "neutral party" who didn't have a stake in the deal. Plus, McCune said, the fact that the mortgage companies knew the details of buyers' finances bolsters the allegations that the builder companies had to know there could be problems with foreclosures and buyers walking in the future.

http://www.bigbuilderonline[…]D=363&articleID=1064107

crashing the economy

Posted by Barton K. Hulett at Feb 09, 2010 10:53 AM
What you say is true, but who would have believed it five years ago? It was not an accident. It was deliberate theft and treachery. People believed the lie that their overpriced and oversold homes would continue to appreciate in value with inflation. Removing currency from the national treasury destroyed inflation and the economy. Now those holding the foreclosed mortgages will profit when the currency is re-evalued by putting the currency back. This programmed inflation will make bankers very rich with homes now worth more than before, and put working people in an economy they cannot afford, working harder and harder for money that is worth less and less.

Tear down the wall!

Posted by Andree Zaleska at Sep 18, 2009 12:41 PM
David, You are absolutely right and I appreciate your gentle reference to the origins of fascist rule. Wall street is the problem, and there are few who say it so directly.


Culture Shift

Posted by David Hastings at Sep 20, 2009 08:41 PM
Thank you Mr. Korten for an interesting article on Van Jones.

I do have many reservations about the Obama administration, especially in regards his continuation of the foreign policies, the war mongering, of the Bush administration, his support to extend the odious "Patriot Act", his refusal to push for investigations and criminal charges against those that used torture to shame our country, his reaching an "agreement" (in secret, no less, so much for his pre-election call for "less secrecy, eh?) with the Insurance Industry and Big Pharma in regards to "Health Care reform."

His ability to be eloquent means nothing when it is just smoother propaganda and war mongering. Nothing.

Some of us pointed out he would be more of the same "Establishment" philosophy, and we are not being proven incorrect. His was a slick P.R. campaign, I'll give him that: when the CFR is on your side, expense is no object.

Some of us voted for an African-American woman that had real desire to change the policies to benefit Main Street, not Wall Street. You sadly ignore her campaign. Just like msm. "Odd that", no?

I was actually hoping to read more about the banksters of Wall Street and what we can do about reigning them in. Stretching their criminal necks from the Key Bridge comes to mind. But Obama reappoints the slimy Bernanke. And you remain silent.

Unlike you, I found nothing "controversial" about Mr. Jones signing a petition calling for an independent investigation of the events of 9/11/01, and was greatly disappointed when he withdrew his signature. Lack of conviction? Didn't know what he was signing? I'd find that hard to believe.

And yes, I also sense a cultural shift, especially in light of the recent poll showing only 29% of Americans find msm news sources as credible: have we entered a period not unlike the USSR population rejecting the State msm sources right before the fall?

Now let's attempt to be certain Alternative news sources uphold some journalistic integrity, shall we?

As in less fawning over Obama, and Van Jones, and sticking to specifics.

What really happened

Posted by Leslie Sutton at Dec 11, 2009 10:00 PM
If you look at Speaking Freely Vol. 1: John Perkins, Confessions of an economic hit man, you will see a trend developed in America that matches what the corporations and our government did in S. America. First, a company goes in to do business, say, like sugar, in the Dominican Republic. Then when the company manages to mess up the ability of those people in that country to fund their own economy and government. Honduras, it was fruit, Mexico, it was oil.

After the companies have messed up the economy and the ecology, the World Bank offers a loan, but in order to get the loan, but the loan never goes to the government. Instead, the money goes to the US (or other) companies, and the taxpayers and government are still liable for the loan. This bankrupts the country more, and then Wal Mart or K Mart or Nike goes in and begins practicing slave labor.

When the people resist then the government of that country has to make a decision, to pacify,or to let American soldiers pacify. John Perkins said when he goes in to offer the loan to these leaders, he tells them they have two choices: They are about to become very rich, or very dead.

These days, the loans are tied to requirements like voting at the UN the way the United States wants them to vote. That's why we now have NAM, which is a Non-Alignment movement on the part of countries, India, Arabia, etc., which now are keeping the Preisent of Sudan from being arrested for genocide. NAM is a defensive response to the UN corruption.

Some of the countries in the past our soldiers pacified for US companies: Mesico, for an Oil company; Haiti and Cuba for National City Bank; Nicaraugua for Brown Brothers Brokerage; Dominican Republic for "sugar interests" Honduras for US Food Companies; and China for Standard Oil.

Later history shows the economic hit men are better at it; and Haiti's story is full of CIA activity.

You can also watch Aristide: The Endless Revolution, that's full of information.

Now,,to get to what happened to us:

Carlton Brown, a commodities trader said that when 9/11 happened, the first thing they did was celebrate because their clients, all in gold, doubled their money immediately. He said on 9/11 the first thing on his mind was gold. When we invaded Iraq in 1991, oil went from 13 to 40 dollars a barrel. The second time we invaded Iran, the traders were praying for Sadaam to make more trouble because his clients made more money that way.

You should watch 911: In Plane Site. Something is really fishy about 911; and that movie proves they weren't American Airline Planes, but I won't spoil it for you. There's more. The thing is, when the United Airlines went bankrupt some people made a killing in the stock market even though the stock market was closed right away. That's because they knew what was going to happen in advance.

Okay, finally to get more pointed in my comment:

These companies have names. And some of them participated very heavily in downsizing our manufacturing capabilities in the 70s through 90s. Some of them then had a lot to do with the housing crash, which I knew about 2 full years before the news stations reported it. Then came the bank failures so TARP could be created,going against 76% of the American People screaming at Congress to not do it. Connect the dots, and you have the very same thing that corporations and banks did to S. Amerian and African countries.

So,why would they do that? Ira Jackson of Harvard said it best: He said that now, the corporations are the high priests of society and the government is powerless against them.

By the way, the some of the same companies that killed manufacturing in this Country are the same companies that were in on the plot to take 500 thousand US veterans and overthrow President Roosevelt during the last great depression.

They cause the depressions, and then they try to over throw the governments. Just like in those "underdeveloped" countries. Check out JP Morgan Dupont Goodyear and Wall Street in the 1930s.

Sam Gibara, CEO of Goodyear, said recently that governments have now lost control of corporations regardless of whether corporations can be trust or not.

Ira Jackson said,"capitalists today commands the heights and has deposed politics and politicians as the new high priests and reiging oligarchs of our systems, capitalists and principle protagonsists and players,corporations and CEOs,have been accorded unusual power and access to the UN. This does not deny the sigificance of politics but these are the new high priests"

I wonder what Obama is going to do about that,cave? Aristide didn't cave, he got kidnapped. Watch it when you get a chance and see how a real man handled things. When they bankrupted his country and had him pay back 500m a year even though he never got any of the money, he still led Haiti to more than double their schools and hospitals. When the corporations saw they could not break him, the CIA armed 200 convicted Haiti criminals and went in and kidnapped Aristide.

We need to find a way to seriously put a dent in the bottom lines of the corporations and make our Senators change corporate law back to what it used to be,take the power away from them.

By the way, high priests, real ones when there were real ones, could not go into the holy of holies with even one pimple on their body. If they did, they died. That's why part of the hgh priest's garment was a rope around his waist. Ira Jackson doesn't even come close.

Thanks for offering me the oppty to write. Have a nice day, and do your best to bankrupt a corporation today.

Leslie Sutton

Leslie Suttons' commentary

Posted by Joe F at Feb 01, 2010 10:12 AM
Leslie: Bravo...I could not have said it better myself, and believe it should be noted that the type of corruption you speak of above has been aimed at the United States, in particular, since the end of the American Revolution. Even Thomas Jefferson made comments regarding the influence of corporations on the new country. Since I do not know you, I wonder if you are aware of ReclaimDemocracy.org, in which there is a wonderful article called "The History of Corporations in the United States".
Since many of the superrich who really run America and the world are the first ones to stand up and thump on that Bible, I think it is important to remember what I consider to be the most profound thing in that book...."The truth will set you free" Why not, then, teach our children the Real truth, as it stands today? I came up with this little ditty for early morning in schools...Why not, they already know the tempo and melody...!
"I pledge allegiance to the flag, of the United States of America Incorporated, and to the corporate rule, family destruction, and enslavement of the working people for which it stands. One nation, lip serving God, highly divisible, with Liberty and Justice for the wealthy".
I apologize for the sarcasm, but then, the truth is not always a silver lined cloud. I am now a fan of yours, as well as Mr. Kortens', and look forward to reading more or your articles. Regards

Personal tools