YES! Magazine Nominated for General Excellence. Read All About It.
Sections
Home » Issues » America: The Remix » Appeals Court Rules Inmates Entitled to Voting Rights

Nonprofit. Independent. Subscriber-supported. DONATE. How you can support our work.

Get a FREE Issue. Yes! I want to try YES! Magazine

YES! by Email
Join over 78,000 others already signed up for FREE YES! news.
[SAMPLE]
link

HomeBannerAd_Bookshelf

The YES! ChicoBag(R). Full-size tote that fits in your pocket!

 

Appeals Court Rules Inmates Entitled to Voting Rights

Thumb Up IconA federal appeals court in January ruled that felons incarcerated in Washington State have been illegally barred from voting. A panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said the state’s prison system is “infected” with racial discrimination and therefore violates voting laws.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Photo by Joevare.

The majority ruled that the ban violated the 1965 National Voting Rights Act on grounds of racial discrimination. According to a University of Washington study, racial and ethnic minorities make up 12 percent of Washington’s population, but account for 36 percent of prison inmates. African Americans are nine times more likely to be incarcerated than whites; because of this, 25 percent of black men in Washington are disenfranchised from voting.

A single plaintiff first brought the case to court in 1996; by the time of this ruling, five more had joined. All are members of minority groups claiming political discrimination by the state.

Similar cases in other states have gone to trial, but this is the first ruling in favor of inmates. Only Vermont and Maine allow incarcerated felons to vote.

Washington State Attorney General Rob McKenna has appealed the 9th Circuit decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.

—Jeff Raderstrong is a Washington, D.C., writer who blogs at changecharity.blogspot.com.

 



“I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled
by America’s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people.”

President Barack Obama,
referring in his State of the Union address to the U.S. Supreme Court decision easing restrictions on campaign spending

SOTU2010-large.jpg

Supreme Court Justices John Roberts and Samuel Alito, left, prior to President Obama’s State of the Union address in January.

Photo by Pete Souza / White House

Interested? Read Fran Korten’s 10 Ways to Stop Corporate Dominance of Politics

 


HAITI

  • “Pro-poor” Relief for Haiti

HUMAN RIGHTS

  • Protests Mount Against Blockade of Gaza

Also ... Study shows, legalizing undocumented immigrants would boost the U.S. economy


ECONOMY

  • Chicago Ward Tries Citizen Budgeting

Also ... Oregon voters approve taxing corporations

spacer

CLIMATE CHANGE

  • Bolivia to Host Climate Summit for the People

Also ... Scotland's Isle of Eigg committed to renewable energy


VOTING
  • Appeals Court Rules Inmates Entitled to Voting Rights

FOOD

  • Sweden Labels Food With CO2 Data

Also ... Washington State bans BPA in baby bottles; World Watch Institute calls for shift towards simplicity

 

Email Signup
America: The Remix
Comment on this article

How to add a commentCommenting Policy

comments powered by Disqus


You won’t see any commercial ads in YES!, in print or on this website.
That means, we rely on support from our readers.

||   SUBSCRIBE    ||   GIVE A GIFT   ||   DONATE   ||
Independent. Nonprofit. Subscriber-supported.




Subscribe Generic Utne Award

Personal tools