Indicators
Opposition to Iraq Invasion Builds
California Delivers for Families & the Earth
Mayan Justice Returns to Guatemala
South Dakota Backs Family Farmers
World Summit Takes on Corporations
Settlement Favors Saipan Workers
Unocal Can Be Sued for Atrocities, says Judge
Grocery Chain Goes Green
Report calls GMOs a “Disaster” for Farmers
Opposition to Iraq Invasion Builds
Since
August, American support for an invasion of Iraq has been slipping
steadily, while opposition is growing. In early August, the Washington
Post found that 69 percent supported war, although that figure dropped
to 46 percent if no allies participate. In late October, a Pew Research
Center poll found that only 55 percent support invasion and only 27
percent support it without allies. Polls also find support for war
dropping dramatically in the event of significant US casualties.
Although
the US Congress voted in October to give President Bush sweeping
authority to wage war on Iraq, dissent against such a war is mounting
throughout the country and the world.
Massive demonstrations
called by International ANSWER (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism) on
Saturday, October 26 drew hundreds of thousands. In Washington, DC, an
estimated 100,000–200,000 people gathered in the largest peace protest
since the Vietnam War, organizers and police told The New York Times.
A
companion march drew 40,000–80,000 in San Francisco, and smaller
marches around the country drew significant numbers, from 800 in
Austin, to 2,500 in Augusta, Maine, and 5,000 in Seattle. Crowds also
demonstrated throughout the world, including 20,000 in Berlin and
20,000 in Rome. A September 28 protest in London drew between 250,000
and 400,000 people.
At the Nobel Peace Prize world summit on
October 19–20, the laureates, led by Mikhail Gorbachev, issued a
statement rejecting an invasion of Iraq and condemning the Bush
administration's new doctrine of preemptive war.
Appearances by Bush
administration officials have been increasingly shadowed by anti-war
protests. Protests are coming at colleges, such as Middlebury College
in Vermont, when alum White House spokesman Ari Fleischer appeared, and
Berkeley just before the war resolution vote. But they are also
occurring in more unexpected locations, such as in Cincinnatti, where
about 4,000 anti-war protesters greeted President Bush on October 7
when he was in town giving a speech urging an invasion of Iraq.
Organizers
report that they are seeing diverse crowds at protests now, including
many people who don't ordinarily come to protests. According to Peter
Lems, Iraq program assistant for the American Friends Service
Committee, much of the most vibrant organizing against an Iraq war is
happening regionally and locally, in places like Wichita, Kansas, and
St. Louis, Missouri.
Protesters who traveled to DC said they
planned to hold more protests back home. ANSWER plans another protest
for Martin Luther King Day, January 18.
The Internet group
MoveOn has been innovative in its use of the Internet to mobilize
activism. MoveOn raised funds over the Internet to support members of
Congress who were being attacked by challengers for their anti-war
vote. In the first two days the group asked for money for these
candidates, it raised $1.25 million, and prior to the election had
raised a total of $2.2 million for candidates.
Before the
congressional war resolution vote, MoveOn used its online petition to
organize 5,000 anti-war volunteers to meet on August 28 with senators
in all 50 states. It uses the same petition to inform signers of
anti-war events in their city or state.
Attention has now
shifted to the United Nations. Anti-war groups are putting pressure on
the UN Security Council not to endorse an invasion of Iraq. Progressive
Portal and Global Exchange have set up a system that allows people to
use the Internet to fax members of the Security Council with the click
of a mouse.
News reports have suggested that Pentagon officials
don't expect to launch an invasion of Iraq until January at the
earliest, and perhaps as late as March. Anti-war groups are preparing
to continue their education campaigns into the fall and winter.
The
Institute for Policy Studies tracked more than 400 anti-war events
around the country in October. A new coalition called United for Peace
is listing events on its website, www.unitedforpeace.org.
—Jason Mark & Carolyn McConnell
Jason Mark is communications director for Global Exchange, www.global exchange.org. For more information on anti-war activities, contact International ANSWER Coalition, www.internationalanswer.org, 415/821-6545; MoveOn, www.moveon.org; Not In Our Name Coalition; www.notinourname.net, 212/969-8058; and Peace Action, www.peace-action.org 202/862-9740
California Delivers for Families & the Earth
California
became the first state in the nation to guarantee its workers the right
to paid family leave when Governor Gray Davis signed Senate Bill 1661
on September 23. Beginning in 2004, the law requires employers to allow
employees up to six weeks leave to care for a newborn child or sick
relative.
The federal Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, a
Clinton initiative, ensures that caregivers who take up to 12 weeks off
work can return to their jobs. The new California law goes further by
entitling all participating workers to a paycheck of about half their
salary—regardless of the size of the company they work for. “This bill
will make it easier for Californians to help their loved ones through a
health crisis, without going broke in the process,” said Davis.
In
order to receive the benefit, employees must opt for payroll deductions
averaging $27 a year per worker. According to an analysis by the Labor
Project for Working Families, decreased reliance on assistance programs
could save the state government $25 million annually, since workers
often turn to public assistance while taking unpaid leave.
Although
paid family leave bills in 27 other states have so far failed to become
law, Hawaii, Maine, Minnesota, New Mexico, and Oregon have passed bills
to research the costs of enacting a paid leave law.
This
landmark legislation comes on the heels of two other California laws;
one sets unprecedented standards for greener energy and the other
reduces global warming emissions.
On September 12, California
passed a law requiring retail sellers of electricity to increase their
use of renewable resources to 20 percent of sales by 2017. The
California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program will nearly double the
state's existing wind, geothermal, biomass, and solar energy. Both
critics and supporters called it the most ambitious energy policy in
the country.
In July, the California Climate Bill became the
first law in the nation to limit the amount of carbon dioxide and other
greenhouse gases from tailpipes of new cars. Starting with model year
2009, carmakers must comply with new carbon pollution standards to be
set by the California Air Resources Board. According to the Sierra
Club, some 40 percent of the country's global warming pollution
emanates from automobiles. California represents 10 percent of the
national auto market.
—Darcy O'Brien
Mayan Justice Returns to Guatemala
In
Guatemala, local judges are abandoning the Spanish colonial system that
was imposed 500 years ago and returning to Mayan traditions that favor
mediation, reconciliation, and personal contact between the victim and
transgressor.
“In the official system,” says justice of the
peace Edgardo Barreda, “there is always a winner and a loser. In the
unofficial indigenous system, we want everyone to go away happy. It's
based more on community.”
In the Mayan system, offenders are
often sent to work for the victim instead of to jail, and the council
of elders is consulted along with the justices of the peace, who draw
heavily on arbitration techniques. These local judges visit the homes
and locations where the dispute is taking place and encourage
face-to-face discussions between the parties involved.
Cases
range from petty theft to spousal abuse and other forms of violence.
“There are no small cases,” says Judge Juan Jose Regalado Rivas.
“Stealing a chicken may seem insignificant, but in many areas it's the
only chicken in the village.“
The return to traditional ways has
been most pronounced in the last five to ten years, the result of both
a growing solidarity between the diverse groups of Mayan descendants
and a new national law that allows indigenous people the right to
return to their own legal systems.
It has been helping to heal
a country that was torn apart by a CIA-backed civil war that lasted 35
years, in which the military brutally murdered or “disappeared” 200,000
people, most of them indigenous.
“The people have absorbed the
war into their skin,” says Barreda. “There is so much violence and hate
still left over from it that when someone steals a chicken he may get
killed by other people in the village without some kind of
intervention.”
Guatemala´s Mayan descendants comprise 60 percent
of the population. The remaining population is mixed race, with a tiny
percentage of Europeans.
Increasingly, Latin Americans of
European descent are beginning to realize that they can learn from the
traditions of the first peoples. “I was all prepared to teach mediation
techniques to the Guatemalan judges,” says Argentine mediation
consultant Monica Lazaro, “Then I found out that they knew more than I
did. The Mayans have been using these techniques for a long, long time.”
—Lisa Garrigues
Lisa Garrigues is a writer who lives in Argentina
South Dakota Backs Family Farmers
South
Dakota voters have rejected efforts to allow corporate farming in the
state. By 54 percent, voters in June rejected Amendment A, which would
have allowed corporate control of farming and permitted companies to
conduct genetic research. The amendment, drafted by the South Dakota
Farmer's Union and the state's secretary of agriculture, among others,
was well funded and largely endorsed by major media across the state.
While
nationwide the number of small family farms has declined dramatically
in the past few decades, South Dakota has not witnessed the same rapid
shift to large-scale, corporate-controlled agriculture. This is largely
thanks to a 1974 statute restricting corporate involvement in farming
and recent measures that have further strengthened the ban.
The
state's citizens have seen a variety of threats to the Family Farm Act
since 1974, including a 1989 attorney general's ruling that exempted
several large corporate operations. Citizen anger against this ruling
resulted in the approval nine years later of Amendment E to the state's
constitution, prohibiting corporations from owning farmland or engaging
in farming.
Proponents of the defeated Amendment A have
accused voters of moving backward, but a study conducted by Drs. Rick
Welsh and Thomas A. Lyson reveals that counties in states with
anti-corporate farming laws saw lower unemployment, fewer impoverished
families, and more farms realizing cash gains than counties in states
without such legislation.
Eight other midwest states have laws
restricting corporate control of farms. South Dakota's measures are the
strictest of their kind.
—Erin Cusick
World Summit Takes on Corporations
One
of the few bright spots in an otherwise disappointing recent World
Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg, South Africa, was
the successful campaign by many non-governmental organizations (NGOs)
to get the summit to commit to making corporations accountable for
their actions. This victory had to be hard fought, with NGOs lobbying
and protesting outside the meeting rooms, and was nearly overturned in
a dramatic last-minute struggle.
Many NGOs had made the
regulation of corporations their main priority for the summit. They saw
the 1992 Rio Earth Summit's failure to regulate corporations as a major
setback. In the decade after Rio, transnational corporations grew even
stronger and are now disciplining governments for their own interests,
instead of governments disciplining them in the public interest.
Agreed
to after an intense struggle, Paragraph 45 of the summit's draft Plan
of Implementation, directs nations to “Actively promote corporate
responsibility and accountability, based on the Rio Principles,
including through
the full development and effective
implementation of inter-governmental agreements and measures,
international initiatives and public-private partnerships, and
appropriate national regulations, and support continuous improvement in
corporate practices in all countries.”
This language was
approved and, after hours of last-minute negotiations over women's
rights and access to health care services, the plan as a whole was
finally adopted at 1 a.m. on September 3. The next step forward is for
the NGOs, the governments, and the UN to follow up on the paragraph and
to take steps toward regulating corporations internationally so as to
make them accountable.
—Martin Khor
Martin Khor is the director of the Third World Network, www.twnside.org.sg
Settlement Favors Saipan Workers
Garment
workers have won a major settlement with employers in Saipan, where
clothing labeled “Made in the USA” has been produced for sub-minimum
wages and under loosely regulated conditions. Seven US retailers and 23
manufacturers have agreed to a settlement amounting to $11.25 million,
settling claims against them of alleged worker right's violations in
the US Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. With the 19
retailers that had settled previously, this closes a three-year legal
battle and brings total settlement to over $20 million.
Some of
the 30,000 garment workers on the island stand to gain up to a year's
worth of back wages, and those who choose to return to their home
countries will be eligible for relocation fees. The settlement also
provides for future monitoring of Saipan's garment factories to ensure
adequate working conditions such as safe drinking water, hot water, and
payment for overtime hours worked, items cited as violations in the
lawsuit.
Saipan is exempted from many US labor, customs, and
immigration laws under policies set in place in 1991. On the island,
the apparel industry can produce clothing that avoids regulations on
imports from foreign nations and can be labeled as manufactured in the
US.
Workers are often recruited from China and the Philippines,
lured by signing bonuses of as much as $5,000 and promises of high
wages. But when the predominantly young female workers reach the remote
island, they are trapped by low wages, set at a minimum of $3.05 per
hour, and large paycheck deductions to pay for food, lodging, and
recruitment fees.
The garment worker's union UNITE and other
anti-sweatshop groups filed the suit on behalf of the island's workers
against retailers, including Tommy Hilfiger, The Gap, Target, Liz
Claiborne and Calvin Klein. The settlement does not include admission
of misconduct. Defendant Levi Strauss has denied the settlement's
allegations and has discontinued its purchase of products from Saipan's
factories.
The anti-sweatshop movement has also gained momentum
with two new union-labor garment companies. In Los Angeles, the new
worker-owned garment label sweatX, produced by teamX, inc, was started
by Ben Cohen (of Ben & Jerry's) and Pierre Ferrari (head of Cohen's
Hot Fudge Venture Fund) to offer clothing produced by workers receiving
a living wage under decent working conditions.
For now, the
label fills only wholesale orders for its products. Jim Hightower's
Rolling Thunder Democracy Tour featured sweatX festival t-shirts, and
Patagonia has contracted some private-label work from the company.
In
Newton, Massachusetts, anti-sweatshop activists have launched No Sweat
Apparel, which will sell union-made clothing over the Internet.
—Erin Cusick
For more information, visit www.nosweatapparel.com.
(Editor's Note: TeamX, inc., makers of the sweatX label,
closed its factory in April of 2004. To learn more about why the
factory failed, and for updates on the future of the sweatX brand,
visit www.sweatx.net.)
Unocal Can Be Sued for Atrocities, says Judge
In
a landmark decision, a federal appeals court ruled on September 18 that
Unocal can be sued in US court on claims that the California-based oil
giant's joint pipeline project with the Burmese military regime used
forced labor. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that Unocal
could be held liable for aiding and abetting the Burmese military's
abuses surrounding the project, which include forced labor, destruction
of villages in the pipeline region, and other human rights violations.
This
case will be the first to go to trial among a number of lawsuits
brought by labor advocates in the US against transnational corporations
for aiding or benefiting from human rights abuses overseas. Most are
proceeding under the 1789 Alien Tort Claims Act, which allows
foreigners to sue one another in US courts. Since a successful case
brought under the law in 1979, human rights lawyers have used the law
to hold multinational firms accountable for human rights violations,
according to The Nation.
The case has the potential to force
major change in corporate conduct, Christine Rosen, an associate
professor at UC Berkeley's Haas School of Business told the Los Angeles
Times. If the case succeeds, “companies will not be able to go abroad
and take advantage of the much looser regulatory environment or the
corruption of the government to treat their workers in an inhumane
way,” Rosen said.
The International Labor Rights Fund, which
brought the suit against Unocal, is also suing ExxonMobil for its
involvement in Indonesian military atrocities, including murder and
torture, against villagers in connection with a joint Indonesian
government-Mobil natural gas project. However, this summer the US
government asked a judge to dismiss the case against ExxonMobil on the
grounds that it could hamper the war on terrorism by alienating the
Indonesian government.
Earlier this year, a federal judge
ruled that a case could go forward against Shell for human rights
abuses by the Nigerian military against opponents of a Shell pipeline.
Last
year, lawyers for a group of Ecuadoreans suing Texaco for environmental
violations filed a complaint with the US Securities and Exchange
Commission, arguing that Chevron's application to merge with Texaco
failed to disclose its potential liability in the case. Similar suits
under the 1789 law have also been filed against Coca-Cola, Del Monte,
DynCorp, and the Drummond Company.
—Carolyn McConnell
Grocery Chain Goes Green
With
2,300 stores and annual revenues of $38 billion, Albertson's is one of
the largest retail food and drug chains in the US. It has now become
one of the nation's largest recyclers.
Self-interest drove the
shift. According to John Bernardo, Albertson's resource conservation
manager, “The typical grocery store has a profit margin of less than 5
percent. To increase revenues, we have two choices: increase food sales
or reduce operating costs.
“We'd been recycling cardboard since
the 1960s, but the sustainability idea came later,” Bernardo told
Greenbiz.com. “In the 1990s, we began looking at waste reduction: What
can we recycle? That led to the next logical question: Why do we have
to generate waste in the first place?”
Albertson's has
retrofitted 90,000 light fixtures, instituted a recyclable plastic tote
system for shuttling items between distribution centers and stores, and
tried scores of smaller experiments, many of them suggested by
employees.
One of the more imaginative efforts involves a
plant in Boise, Idaho, where Albertson's makes several different kinds
of ice cream every day. In the past, some ice cream was lost during
flavor changes because it was a mix of two flavors. Today, compatible
flavors are produced back-to-back, packaged under the name “Odds &
Ends,” and sold or donated locally. One in-store deli has taken the
soybean oil used to fry chicken, filtered the breading out of it, and
recycled it to fuel a hot water heater. The store saves both on waste
disposal and energy consumption.
The company also worked to
develop new boxes made of recycled corrugated cardboard to replace the
totally unrecyclable, paraffin-coated produce boxes. The containers can
also be used for in-store display, reducing handling and labor costs,
decreasing the number of truck trips necessary to transport produce,
reducing product damage, and increasing recycling revenues.
—Jill Bamburg
Report calls GMOs a “Disaster” for Farmers
Confirming
concerns about genetically modified food crops, a British report calls
GM food “a practical and economic disaster” for North America.
In
preparation for the British government's upcoming decision on whether
to allow GM crops to be commercially grown in the United Kingdom, the
Soil Association issued Seeds of Doubt, which says of GM crops, “In
complete contrast to the impression given by the biotechnology
industry, it is clear that they have not realized most of the claimed
benefits. Widespread GM contamination has severely disrupted GM-free
production including organic farming, destroyed trade, and undermined
the competitiveness of North American agriculture overall.”
Three-quarters of the world's GM food is grown in the US and Canada.
According
to the report, non-GM farmers are finding it difficult or impossible to
grow GM-free crops. Food processing and distribution have had costly
and disruptive contamination incidents. As a result of contamination, a
number of farmers have even been accused of infringing company patent
rights. Monsanto sued for $400,000 a non-GM farmer in Canada whose crop
was contaminated by GMOs.
The problems have led many US farm
organizations to urge farmers to plant non-GM crops this year. A number
of US and Canadian agriculture groups and more than 200 other groups
are lobbying for a ban or moratorium on the introduction of the next
major proposed GM food crop, GM wheat.
The most recent
development in genetic engineering of food is the cloning of animals
for milk and meat. Milk from cloned cows and meat from the offspring of
cloned cows and pigs could show up on grocery shelves as early as next
year under the plans of livestock breeders who are already raising
clones on American farmsteads. A recent National Academy of Sciences
(NAS) report on these developments did not find conclusive evidence of
harm to environment or consumers, but called for additional studies.
One
concern for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is that breeders
going to the expense of cloning may also attempt genetic modification
of the animals, perhaps to make them leaner or improve milk production.
Such genetic manipulation poses far more potential problems than mere
cloning does, and the agency would likely require extensive proof that
the gene-altered animals are safe to eat.
A few cloned cows
scattered around the country are already producing milk. Farmers and
companies have held off selling it only because of informal requests
from the FDA. Absent compelling evidence of a problem, it's not clear
the FDA or any other government agency would have the legal power to
keep cloned animals out of the food supply.
The Humane Society
has asked the Food and Drug Administration to block sales of products
from cloned farm animals, their byproducts, and offspring due to
concerns that large-scale cloning will lead to widespread animal
suffering related to higher mortality rates during pregnancy and
immediately after birth.
—Rik Langendoen
For more information on GM foods, see www.gefoodalert.org and www.thecampaign.org
That means, we rely on support from our readers.
||
SUBSCRIBE ||
GIVE A GIFT ||
DONATE ||
Independent. Nonprofit. Subscriber-supported.

