Sections
Home » Peace & Justice » What’s Wrong with Avatar?

YES! I want to try YES!
Magazine.
YES! by Email
Join over 62,000 others already signed up for FREE YES! news.
[SAMPLE]  [ARCHIVE]
YES! This Week email logo
Sign up for our weekly highlights email. 

David Korten's Agenda for a New Economy: 3 Ways to Get the Book

Posters ad (generic)

Hot or Cold: the YES! Klean Kanteen

 

What’s Wrong with Avatar?

OK, I enjoyed the movie. A lot. Right up to when I took off the goggles and reflected on the ending.

Avatar film still

In James Cameron's Avatar, former Marine Jake Sully leads the indigenous Na'vi in a war against defense contractors working for a mining corporation from Earth.

Photo courtesy of OfficialAvatarMovie

But first let me acknowledge that Avatar is an incredible production. James Cameron accomplished a feat of imagination and technology that marks a breakthrough in the movie-going experience. And, like many of my progressive friends, I loved the fact that Avatar portrays a nature-centered culture in such a positive light and vilifies one that is exploitative, corporate-driven, and alienated.

But then there’s that ending. Ouch. It takes a white guy to save the natives from the white guys. The white guy tames the biggest, baddest bird. He comes sailing in with his breakthrough notion to unify all the tribes and crush the exploiters in spite of their massive firepower. They do the battle and win! So now it’s the natives holding the machines guns.

What is wrong with this picture? Well, first let’s note that the Jake Sully character is not the first person to have thought about uniting the natives to fight the invaders. To take just one example, let’s remember Tecumseh. His vision was to unite all the tribes west of the Appalachian Mountains and prevent the outsiders from taking their land. He mobilized a whole confederacy, and, as on Pandora, at first they won some battles. But you may have noticed that the invaders got well beyond the Appalachians. Tecumseh’s people were famously defeated at the Battle of Tippecanoe and the victorious General Harrison then rode his reputation as a winner straight to the White House. Native people the world over have experienced the same problem—if you defeat one group of invaders, the “sender culture” just sends more.

Morocco-1Weapons of Mass Democracy
Here’s evidence that nonviolence is the most powerful tool to promote democracy and overthrow tyranny.

So what’s the real answer? There are many paths to power that don’t involve guns. Yeah, they take longer and can’t be portrayed in a burst of climactic drama. But they seem to work better. That’s why native people for centuries have survived by withdrawing to a safer spot to regroup. Some have gone on to find those other routes to power. Like using the “sender culture’s” laws to gain recognition of rights; exploiting the sender culture’s enthusiasm for gambling to gain financial power; reviving traditions to strengthen cultural power; and perhaps most importantly, working with allies to change the sender culture itself. It’s that last one, I believe, that’s the true solution.

I’ve got a great example of its success right next door with my neighbors the Suquamish. They’ve been using all the nonviolent levers. Yep, they’ve got a thriving casino. They, together with other Northwest tribes, have mounted lawsuits to defend their rights to fish and to protect land and fishing grounds. They’ve helped revive the region’s magnificent canoe journey traditions. And they’ve worked with allies to, among other things, regain their land.

One place is particularly poignant. In 1904 the U.S. military took over part of their land where Chief Seattle once lived. In 2004, exactly 100 years later, the State of Washington returned that land, after a campaign that involved many non-native allies, including YES! Magazine editor Sarah van Gelder. Then, just last March, they opened a new building, called the "House of Awakened Culture," right next to the newly regained land. It’s a place of community for the Suquamish. But it is also a place for native and non-native alike to share a different vision for how to live—one that respects all the creatures and the Earth and allows us to come together as a community, honor our ancestors and our roots, and build a world that works for everyone.

So, back on Pandora, my advice to the beautiful Neytiri and the warrior Tsu’tay: Don’t follow Jake. Instead, enlist him. And biologist Grace too. Get them to support you in preserving your own culture, learning the sender culture’s laws, strengths, and weaknesses, and helping the sender culture to learn another way to be in the world. Build a House of Awakened Culture and gradually grow the number of Jakes and Graces to work for a transformed world.

James Cameron, I’ll leave to you how to make that ending work cinematically. It hasn’t got the colorful triumph of your violent ending, but it may be truer to human history. In the meantime, thanks for a great ride and for getting a lot of people thinking—including me.


Fran Korten

Fran Korten wrote this article for YES! Magazine, a national, nonprofit media organization that fuses powerful ideas with practical actions. Fran is the publisher of YES! Magazine.

YES! Magazine encourages you to make free use of this article by taking these easy steps. Korten, F. (2010, January 14). What’s Wrong with Avatar?. Retrieved February 09, 2012, from YES! Magazine Web site: http://www.yesmagazine.org/peace-justice/whats-wrong-with-avatar. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons License


You won’t see any commercial ads in YES!, in print or on this website.
That means, we rely on support from our readers.

||   SUBSCRIBE    ||   GIVE A GIFT   ||   DONATE   ||
Independent. Nonprofit. Subscriber-supported.




Reader Comments

Thanks for the enlightenment!

Posted by Jess Lind-Diamond at Jan 20, 2010 03:01 PM
I left this movie feeling incredibly depressed. It seemed that the happy ending was entirely fictionalized, while the violence and destruction had so many parallels in the "real" world. Thanks, Fran, for reminding us that there are other ways to preserve culture, land, and our compassion for one another. And we're already living in 3D!

Na'vi are savvy organizers not dependent on saviors

Posted by Erik Assadourian at Jan 20, 2010 03:01 PM
Interesting analysis Fran. However, I have to disagree with the white savior view of Avatar for three reasons.
1) if white colonists hadn't come in the first place, they wouldn't have needed a white savior (so Jake was more of a paramedic than a messiah).
2) he isn't actually a white savior but physically becomes a Na'vi. Yes, he is of another culture, but as he lives as 'the other,' he becomes one of them and, as one of them, becomes a willing defender of them against his own (former) people. This is shown by his willingness to risk his life to tame the Toruk (which the movie suggests other Na'vi have done in the past when the need was great enough). He was literally willing to risk all to help what had become his people.
3) the indigenous Na'vi do exactly what you suggest in your article: "perhaps most importantly, working with allies to change the sender culture itself. It’s that last one, I believe, that’s the true solution." Jake Scully only is allowed into the tribe because they want to use him to understand their enemy and hope to use Jake to stop the humans. They strategically want to use Jake (either for intelligence or even to 'make him an ally') just as the corporation wanted to use Jake to figure out how to get the Na'vi to move or convince them to move.

So the movie shows that the Na'vi people were quite forward thinking in recruiting allies to help defend their people against invaders with far superior weaponry. Instead, if the Na'vi had sent lawyers to fight the corporate exploitation of Pandora, my guess is that the Na'vi would be dead or pushed to unsuitable reservations long before the court order arrived telling the corporation to cease and desist. A point I make in my comparison of Avatar with the documentary Crude. http://bit.ly/avatarmeetcrude Modern warriors (lawyers) unfortunately cannot succeed in such swift terms as they can in myths.

Erik Assadourian
eassadourian (at) worldwatch.org
Transforming Cultures Project
Worldwatch Institute
blogs.worldwatch.org/transformingcultures

I agree

Posted by Julia at Mar 04, 2010 04:30 PM
Erik's thoughts were the same as mine when I read that some people felt that the movie was saying a white guy was needed to save the natives.

For example, he knew to jump on the bullzozer and crack the camera, because he knew how it worked.

It wasn't that he was white, it was that he had inside knowledge of the enemy. They used him just as the army used him to get to know the N'avi.

I also agree with another poster "who saved who"? The Nav'i clearly saved Jack.

I'm not native, so I can't walk in their shoes, but I didn't have the same take as they did. What does James Cameron say about that charge? Only he can say what his idea was when crafting the ending, and it should be taken at face value.

What a great article!

Posted by Pancho at Jan 20, 2010 03:01 PM
Namaste dear citizens of the BeLOVED Earth CommUNITY! :-)

May we develop calm minds and balanced hearts.

As usual, mamá Fran enriched our lives with more and more inspiration. The articulation of the fractures of the movie are sharp and clear (not to mention the thousands of people who are suffering intense feelings of depression and suicidal thoughts after seeing the movie).

Mamá Fran, an absolutely gifted-impressive writer and an extraordinary human being, who truly embodies the new paradigm! Mamá Fran, the Feminine Divine at its best! :-)

Perhaps the only addition I would make to be almost completely aligned with the emerging paradigm, from my point of view, would be to change the title from "What's wrong with Avatar?" to "Why Avatar still stuck in the past?" or "Wake up Avatar! For Real!" or to match the idiomatic expression: "What's out of harmony with Avatar?"

I know it is an idiomatic expression but new paradigms require new language... "Out beyond ideas of right and wrong doing there is a field. I will meet you there." Rumi ;-)

I'm really looking forward to seeing a movie with the suggestions from mamá Fran. Maybe it could be not a movie but a documentary of the Great Turning...

May all become compassionate, courageous and wise.

If you want to be a rebel, be kind. Human-kind, be both.
Planetizing the Movement of the Ahimsa (R)evolution from some corner of our round borderless country...
In radical love,
Pancho

Great Notion, But...

Posted by Dave at Jan 21, 2010 11:37 AM
Your solutions make great sense for the real world, but Avatar is entertainment; a product designed to engage viewers and make money. It seems to have done quite well in that regard. In a nutshell, the flaw in your article is that it takes the movie far more seriously than is warranted. Don't look to Hollywood for real answers to life's difficulties.

should we always be this serious?

Posted by erica giorda at Jan 21, 2010 11:37 AM
peace.
i haven't seen the movie, so i won't comment on the content. i just wonder: should we always carry the burden of judgement? it's a movie...
should i drop everything is read to relax, from the Lord of the Rings to SciFi to the Oprah magazine because it is not related to the Cause? bury the world literature because -yes- it is full of violence? Tolstoi yes and the Greek tragedy no, because it does not foster the cause.
my kids tease me constantly because i already lecture them on everything and don't let'em buy junk food. But if they go to a party i'm not going to tell them not to eat, even if it's McDonald stuff.
Please try not to detach ourselves too much from the world we live in, or our action will loose any grip.
respect

erica

Unrealistic Expectation!

Posted by Richard Kasden at Jan 29, 2010 09:36 AM
Good article and quite insightful. My issue with the article is one of perspective. The author’s dislike of the ending is coming from the perspective of lessons learned over hundreds of years. We’re starting to understand what works and what doesn’t work from centuries of trial and error. To dislike the ending because it doesn’t come from that perspective doesn’t make sense to me. To expect and prefer that the Na’vi behave differently than they did is kind of missing the point. This culture was in deep traumatic shock and in just a few days the author expects them find an entirely different way of relating to the white man, a way “depicting a real path to peace and cultural transformation”? If that were the ending, I would have walked out thinking “OUCH”!

Who Really Saved Who...?

Posted by Tim Modok at Feb 28, 2010 12:49 AM
I've heard this 'white hero saves natives' crit of Avatar from several now. But I have to ask, who really saved who? I see a physically, emotionally & spiritually crippled soldier choosing to turn the guns around because he has actually become more physically, emotionally and spiritually identified with the Na'vi than with his own "real" deathly existence. The juxtaposition of the crippled soldier unable to stand on his own two feet in the real world and the Jake who chooses to run free with the deeply ecologically in-touch natives couldn't be a clearer metaphor for our own real life choice, could it? Think about it: isn't choosing to using their own life power for what is right exactly what we'd like real US soldiers to choose to do, rather than obediently continuing to fight wars of occupation and genocide on the orders of superior officers? Isn't it also the choice each of us has; whether or not we personally will continue to collaborate with the very real death culture the US government, multinational corporations, and global finance capital represents today in our own real world? In fact, isn't this also the key choice we ALL must make as our own families, communities and planetary life support systems face incipient collapse under the weight of a ruthlessly greedy & power-hungy elite bent on empire, even at the expense of xenocide? In any case, it becomes clear who saves who near the final moments of the film: Jake, held helpless by his former commander, is about to lose his rather colorful Na'vi life, but is saved by an arrow shot through the Colonel's chest by a young woman, Naytiri, who literally teaches Jake everything Na'vi he knows after first saving his life early in their very first encounter. Isn't that the metaphorical revolution we really should overtly identify with, as wise and courageous young women (and men...) show the spiritually-crippled, testerone-poisoned and very well armed perps how to transform and save themselves, along with the rest of us? Notably, for deep ecologists and others who realistically acknowledge what is truly at stake, when Entertainment Weekly asked Cameron to comment on the critique that Avatar "is the perfect eco-terrorism recruiting tool..." he said: "Good, good, I like that one. I believe in eco-terrorism." Maybe for Cameron Avatar is all about learning how to save ourselves for a change.

Avatar, a point of reference

Posted by David Anderson at Mar 01, 2010 11:26 AM
Avatar was fun, short term.
After the movie, I seek to find how to help Native Americans launch a new Thanksgiving, saving the "White Man" from himself again, by helping us out of the mess we have made of almost everything.
If anyone has the answer, rally us, help us, because after studying thier way of life, medicine, shamans, and more, they could be our only hope, again.

Good article

Posted by Randy at Mar 07, 2010 07:21 PM
Avatar was funded by Rupurt Murdock. He also who owns a large fake news organization.

peace is the way to overcome war

Posted by Elizabeth- cawobeth at Mar 17, 2010 06:38 PM
I really enjoyed your article, by the way.
I saw the ending as a cry for a sequel. Though I don't usually tend to project, I did consider what a sequel may be. I imagined that more of the world life in harmony with nature; thus no need for war. *I'm a hopeless romantic.
Allow me to offer an analogy to your suggestion that war can be overcome with peace-
"Hatred can be overcome only by love." Mahatma Gandhi
 

Avatar

Posted by William J Zaspel at Dec 31, 2010 06:44 AM
You may have noticed that Jake failed to do almost everything he set out to do from his initial commission. It was only when he embraced the alternate culture that he was able to get out of his own way and help them save themselves. We can't know what took place after the invaders were forced to leave Pandora, but we can hope that Sulley's new found value set continue to expand and he continued to grow in his new family.

I completely disagree with your analysis of the this movie but I celebrate your reasoning in how we should join with our adversaries to find a non-violent solution to conflicts. Sometimes, however, that just doesn't work, as in the case of the idiots that failed to see the true value of Pandora and it's blue people. My only regret found in the plot of the movie was that the contamination by the technology that was foisted upon the Na'vi.

Thank you for your part and the efforts of all those at Yes! for recognizing the gross injustice that has been done to the Native American Peoples. I am bitterly sorry for the loss of so much of their culture and truth that we will never know.

Dances with Smufs

Posted by Alex McGilvery at Dec 31, 2010 08:02 AM
I heard a great radio call in program on the Aboriginal radio station up here in Manitoba. They were discussing the notion that even positive stereotypes are still stereotypes. Avatar in this context used several stereotypes of aboriginal people - the wise in-tune-with-nature one, the helpless-against-the-(white)-invaders, the need-an(white)outsider-to-save-them.

The point of much of the discussion was that they are still living with those stereotypes along with others in their dealings with the colonial culture around them. We need movies that challenge and break all kinds of stereotypes so we can move forward.

Avatar's credability

Posted by Leo at Dec 31, 2010 11:20 PM
I am thinking steriotypes are nessecary as would be too difficult to grasp or relate to in a meaningful way for most peoples, not that that detracts from the pertinence of the message, presuming none of us posses the authority to dictate to another, even if might is right as the oppressed may posses their own might though often less impressive.
Greed and lust for power will always be "ugly" despite their publicised offerings of security and comfort.

comment on Avatar apraisal

Posted by Leo at Dec 31, 2010 11:03 PM
I thought Avatar was ok, in the vein of "The day the Earth stood still" and "I Robot" sort of thing. We are our own worst enemies. I am not inclined to believe greed and lust for power is beneficial even if we can get away with it. Personally I am inclined to believe a Karmic influence will "get" us sooner or later.

People Who Love YES! Find Out Why... Subscribe Today

Personal tools