Sections
Home » People Power » 10 Ways to Stop Corporate Dominance of Politics

YES! I want to try YES!
Magazine.
YES! by Email
Join over 62,000 others already signed up for FREE YES! news.
[SAMPLE]  [ARCHIVE]
YES! This Week email logo
Sign up for our weekly highlights email. 

David Korten's Agenda for a New Economy: 3 Ways to Get the Book

Posters ad (generic)

Hot or Cold: the YES! Klean Kanteen

 
 

10 Ways to Stop Corporate Dominance of Politics

It's not too late to limit or reverse the impact of the Supreme Court's disastrous decision in Citizens United v. FEC.
— tags:

Clean coal, illustration by Chris Clark

Corporate power influences many political decisions, from energy and climate policy to health care reform.

Illustration by Chris Clark

The recent Supreme Court decision to allow unlimited corporate spending in politics just may be the straw that breaks the plutocracy’s back.

Pro-democracy groups, business leaders, and elected representatives are proposing mechanisms to prevent or counter the millions of dollars that corporations can now draw from their treasuries to push for government action favorable to their bottom line. The outrage ignited by the Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission extends to President Obama, who has promised that repairing the damage will be a priority for his administration.

But what can be done to limit or reverse the effect of the Court’s decision? Here are 10 ideas:

  1. Amend the U.S. Constitution to declare that corporations are not persons and do not have the rights of human beings. Since the First Amendment case for corporate spending as a free speech right rests on corporations being considered “persons,” the proposed amendment would strike at the core of the ruling’s justification. The push for the 28th Amendment is coming from the grassroots, where a prairie fire is catching on from groups such as Public Citizen, Voter Action, and the Campaign to Legalize Democracy.
  2. Require shareholders to approve political spending by their corporations. Public Citizen and the Brennan Center for Justice are among the groups advocating this measure, and some members of Congress appear interested. Britain has required such shareholder approval since 2000.
  3. Pass the Fair Elections Now Act, which provides federal financing for Congressional elections. This measure has the backing of organizations representing millions of Americans, including Moveon.org, the NAACP, the Service Employees International Union, and the League of Young Voters. Interestingly, the heads of a number of major corporations have also signed on, including those of Ben & Jerry’s, Hasbro, Crate & Barrel, and the former head of Delta Airlines.
  4. Give qualified candidates equal amounts of free broadcast air time for political messages. This would limit the advantages of paid advertisements in reaching the public through television where most political spending goes.
  5. Ban political advertising by corporations that receive government money, hire lobbyists, or collect most of their revenue abroad. A fear that many observers have noted is that the Court’s ruling will allow foreign corporations to influence U.S. elections. According to The New York Times, Sen. Charles Schumer (D-New York) and Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Maryland) are exploring this option.
  6. Impose a 500 percent excise tax on corporate contributions to political committees and on corporate expenditures on political advocacy campaigns. Representative Alan Grayson (D-Florida) proposes this, calling it "The Business Should Mind Its Own Business Act."
  7. Prohibit companies from trading their stock on national exchanges if they make political contributions and expenditures. Another one from Grayson, which he calls "The Public Company Responsibility Act."
  8. Require publicly traded companies to disclose in SEC filings money used for the purpose of influencing public opinion, rather than for promoting their products. Grayson calls this "The Corporate Propaganda Sunshine Act."
  9. Require the corporate CEO to appear as sponsor of commercials that his or her company pays for, another possibility from the Schumer-Van Hollen team, according to The New York Times
  10. Publicize the reform options, inform the public of who is making contributions to whom, and activate the citizenry. If we are to safeguard our democracy, media must inform and citizens must act.

The measures listed above—and others that seek to reverse the dominance of money in our political system—will not be easy. But grassroots anger at this latest win for corporate power is running high. History shows that when the public is sufficiently aroused, actions that once seemed impossible can, in hindsight, seem inevitable.


Fran KortenFran Korten wrote this article for YES! Magazine, a national, nonprofit media organization that fuses powerful ideas with practical actions. Fran is publisher of YES! Magazine.

Interested?
Communities Take Power :: How small-town citizens are claiming the right to govern themselves by challenging laws stacked in favor of corporations.

Envision Spokane :: Communities around the country are using local law to promote the rights of citizens over those of corporations.

YES! Magazine encourages you to make free use of this article by taking these easy steps. Korten, F. (2010, January 25). 10 Ways to Stop Corporate Dominance of Politics. Retrieved February 03, 2012, from YES! Magazine Web site: http://www.yesmagazine.org/people-power/10-ways-to-stop-corporate-dominance-of-politics. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons License


You won’t see any commercial ads in YES!, in print or on this website.
That means, we rely on support from our readers.

||   SUBSCRIBE    ||   GIVE A GIFT   ||   DONATE   ||
Independent. Nonprofit. Subscriber-supported.




Reader Comments

The Corporate Leviathan

Posted by Philippe Valdois at Jan 27, 2010 11:21 AM
Excellent suggestions.
We should all start by thinking about whom or what we are supposed to fight against.
On the one hand we can recognize the non-human nature of big corporations or, like Gerry Spence suggests, we can go the opposite direction and recognize the responsibility of corporate managers and decisions makers.
This is difficult since, as we have seen in the nazi bureaucratic machine and elsewhere, all decisions tend to be fragmented in such a way that personal responsibility (and its perception by the culprit) become more and more diluted.

Corporations need to have their rights as a "person" removed

Posted by Thom Philipel at Jan 28, 2010 08:54 AM
I was just thinking about corporations needing their rights as an "individual" removed legally and permanently today when an interview lead me to Yes magazine.

The first article that caught my eye was this one.

So after clicking over to "We the corporations" (http://www.movetoamend.org/) and signing the petition for exactly this, I'm back here to check out Yes.

corporate "persons

Posted by Lee Ferrell at Jan 28, 2010 08:55 AM
The system has been rigged for so long - it may take a constitutional convention..., leaving the plutocrats in power. The scope of the problem is so vast - the halls of Congress swarming with lobbyists scurrying hither and yon, depleting any hope of real change. Congress is no more than a leisure club for the rich to play a varient of Monopoly with hard earned tax dollars. It is time for a populist revolt.... The monied men are in charge. They have no interest in helping the genuinely needy abandoned by this rapacious system.

action is needed

Posted by phil at Jan 28, 2010 03:39 PM
there is a coalition of activists, citizens and lawyers who have started a campaign to legalize democracy, in which they want to amend the constitution to outlaw corporate personhood. that concept really lies at the root of the problems we face with the rising tide of corporate power.

give the website a look:
http://movetoamend.org/

corporate sponsorship

Posted by Antonio at Jan 30, 2010 11:28 AM
I think we need to make it like NASCAR: require politicians to sport the logos of their corporate sponsors.

Hold the politicians accountable.

Posted by Ian Wilder at Jan 30, 2010 11:29 AM
Don't vote for or contribute to politicians or political parties that take corporate money. And Yes, that includes the President and the vast majority of Congress.

the train has left the station

Posted by TOM MATT at Jan 31, 2010 10:06 AM
  there are 35,000 lobbyists giving bags of money to law makers to vote against your interests.you are a spectator nothing more.

corporations should be limited in donations

Posted by Audrey Watson at Feb 02, 2010 11:59 AM
corporations are made up of individuals, but in the aggregrate they seem to lose some of their ethics.

The Supremes

Posted by Tom Degan at Mar 18, 2010 01:48 PM
Are corporations really persons?

Do corporations think?

Do corporations weep?

Do corporations fall in love?

Do corporations grieve when a loved one dies as a result of a lack of adequate health care?

Do corporations have loved ones?

Are corporations even capable of loving?

Do corporations sometimes lose sleep at night worrying about disease, violence, destruction, and the suffering of their fellow human beings?

Do corporations feel your pain?

Can a corporation run for public office?

Is a corporation capable of having a sense of humor? Is it capable of laughing at itself? (EXAMPLE: "So these two corporations walk into a bar....")

If a corporation ever committed an unspeakable crime against the American people, could IT be sent to federal prison? (Note the operative word here: "It")

Can a corporation register to vote?

We all know that corporations have made a shit-load of cash throughout our history by profiting on the unspeakable tragedy of war. But has a corporation ever given its life for its country?

Is a corporation capable of raising a child?

Does a corporation have a conscience? Does it feel remorse after it has done something really bad?

Has a corporation ever been killed in an accident as the result of a design flaw in the automobile it was driving?

Has a corporation ever written a novel or a dramatic play or a song that inspired millions?

Has a corporation ever risked its life by climbing a ladder to save a child from a burning house?

Has a corporation ever won an Oscar? Or an Emmy? Or a Tony? Or the Nobel Peace Prize? Or a Polk or Peabody Award? Or the Pulitzer Prize in Biography?

Has a corporation ever performed Schubert's Ave Maria?

Has a corporation ever been shot and killed by someone who was using an illegal and unregistered gun?

Has a corporation ever paused to reflect upon the simple beauty of an autumn sunset or a brilliant winter moon rising on the horizon?

If a tree falls in the forest, does it make a noise if there are no corporations there to hear it?

Should corporations kiss on the first date?

Could a corporation resolve to dedicate its life to being an artist? Or a musician? Or an opera singer? Or a Catholic priest? Or a rabbi? Or a Doctor? Or a Dentist? Or a sheet metal worker? Or a gourmet chef? Or a short-order cook? Or a magician? Or a nurse? Or a trapeze artist? Or an author? Or an editor? Or a Thrift Shop owner? Or a EMT worker? Or a book binder? Or a Hardware Store clerk? Or a funeral director? Or a sanitation worker? Or an actor? Or a comedian? Or a glass blower? Or a chamber maid? Or a film director? Or a newspaper reporter? Or a deep sea fisherman? Or a farmer? Or a piano tuner? Or a jeweler? Or a janitor? Or a nun? Or a Trappist Monk? Or a poet? Or a pilgrim? Or a bar tender? Or a used car salesman? Or a brick layer? Or a mayor? Or a soothsayer? Or a Hall-of-Fame football player? Or a soldier? Or a sailor? Or a butcher? Or a baker? Or a candlestick maker?

Could a corporation choose to opt out of all the above and merely become a bum? Living life on the road, hopping freight trains and roasting mickeys in the woods?

I realize that this is pure theological speculation on my part but the question is just screaming to be posed: When corporations die, do they go to Heaven?

Our lives - yours and mine - have more worth than any goddamned corporation. To say that the Supreme Court made a awful decision last January is an understatement. Not only is it an obscene ruling, it is an insult to our humanity.

http://www.tomdegan.blogspot.com

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

Ending all non-person donations

Posted by Walt at Mar 21, 2010 09:08 AM
   Watching this issue develop it's interesting to see the Left running with this an an anti-corporate campaign. I would support the idea but only if it blocks all non-person entities. I haven't seen anything so far about the proposed amendment blocking unions. Corporations and Unions are both non-person entities with political motives. Both organizations use entity funds for political purposes without the consent of individual members. Amend to block both.

Limiting Influence From Outside the District

Posted by Howard at Mar 25, 2010 08:52 AM
I'd like to see laws against donations from outside the district which a candidate represents. Even if you accept that corporations are "people" because they represent a group of people (I don't buy that argument unless shareholders and employees have anonymously approved a campaign expenditure)...there is no arguing the fact that a Congressional candidate, for example, represents constituents in their own district. They may vote on issues that effect the entire nation, but they do so as representatives of their respective districts. I see no reason why a drug company (or for that matter why "regular people") in one state should have influence over politicians nationwide.

stats

Posted by Graham at May 22, 2010 10:37 AM
Any stats on how widespread grassroots support for such measures are?

Grassroots support

Posted by Doug Pibel at May 24, 2010 11:00 AM
An ABC News/Washington Post poll taken Feb. 4–8, 2010, found that 80 percent of Americans oppose the Court's ruling, including 65 percent who "strongly" oppose it. Opposition cuts across the political spectrum: 85 percent of Democrats oppose the ruling, as do 81 percent of Independents, and 76 percent of Republicans.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/[…]/AR2010021701151.html

Corporate takeover of congress

Posted by Terrence Smyth at Aug 18, 2010 06:14 PM
In pushing for an amendment to the constitution, changing the decision by our Supreme Court(in its infinite one sided wisdom) to give more rights to corporations than citizens, it is sad we have to amend the document which very clearly never stated that corporations were human beings and citizens of the United States of America!
During my classes in political science, one of the first lessons was that government in a democracy is meant to protect its citizens and regulate business. There is no doubt that the reverse has been followed in regulating citizens and protecting business. Of course business has paid for that protection by purchasing the number of legislators needed just for that purpose.
Everyone should be overjoyed there is someone willing to push for an amendment to right the wrongs, and sad we have to fight our way back to having a democracy in America.

Terrence Smyth

Re: Corporations represent people

Posted by MarkPitts at Dec 15, 2010 05:31 PM
Corporations represent real people and their totally legitimate economic interests. Many many more people own stock in major corporations than voted for Obama.

Corporations represent people

Posted by Nick Stanton at Aug 12, 2011 08:27 PM
I would suggest that those who own stock in corporations share responsibility for the actions of those corporations, both actually and karmically. "Corporations represent people" is actually backwards. People represent and are responsible for corporations, whether they are stockholders, employees or board members. It is ultimately the people who are responsible.

corporate origins

Posted by Nick Stanton at Dec 27, 2010 07:36 PM
When corporations were first legally sanctioned there was real awareness of the risks. A corporate charter was issued as a privilege, for a limited time and a stated public benefit. At the time the charter would expire the corporation had to show that it had lived up to it's public benefit commitment. These provisions were gradually eroded until today and the upside down situation we now see. It's time to roll things back to the way they were to begin with, not just limited or transparent political contributions. If we're going to do all the work for a Constitutional Amendment let's get it right.

danger of Citizens United and unrestrained capitalism

Posted by Peter Mullen at Aug 12, 2011 07:47 PM
Legacy of Capitalists and other isms
By Peter Mullen
 
A message in a bottle tossed to the sea to wander harsh wind, and current.
No thinking flesh to learn,to feel, understand, or care.
Their smug victory, scourge of hubris rolls in crushing waves.
Reptilian creed raining desolation, the far shore of the Rubicon.
 On remote islands, sad wastelands of silent loss we cry.
No man or beast to share our loneliness; now sweltering dread.

None will see if hopes and dreams made their way .
Great wonders once filled hearts and minds now foul stench.
No child shall play in swirling dunes or cool breezes
No loving embrace in gentle forests.
No laughter in swimming holes where brave boys jumped from high rocks.
No longer bounty to sustain but fetid pools of poisoned soup.

Pinnacles once sparkling heights torn as if by some angry hand
Sweet milk that nursed kingdoms from crystal streams turned to dust.
No more shall striving teams reach vistas of ego and conquest.
No sacred place remains to leave offerings and none to claim them.
Gone are flags once purest prayers on strings carried to gods.
Oh soaring goddess of creation Oh Ganges no more shall you cleanse us

Boastful tyrants lie justly rotting, their cruelty and murder doomed obscurity.
None shall rise in hateful schemes and willfulness to rape their mother’s corpse.
The stories of a billion years lost as a falling tree no one to hear.
Their fattened hoards once so fetching; the lure for whores now old and useless.
Once poor men took bounty sustaining clans, and tribes from teaming depths.
Their swirling putrid prize our ancient cradle now a mournful sewer of death.

Your twisted spawn your thrusting pleasures have brought us here.
Not for peaceful pleasures to share in happiness and kind feasts.
Not to sooth the pain of broken lives or heal wounds deep and bleeding
Not to build a house of shelter from harsh storms and fears in the darkness
Not to teach of higher things that might have lifted us and brought us home
Not for these things but for ruthless craven debauchery and greed.

No wish no dream or spark of light can make this ancient song return.
No jealous Zeus No skillful hand will ever write this symphony of life.
No swirling galaxy, no clouds of cosmic alchemy will play the secret chords.
In the depths of cold and darkness remnants of our screams live on in frequencies.
Fleeting memories of squandered lives of eden lost a fools last breaths.
Only cold endless darkness even worlds expanding run as if from your disease.

(Copyright) public non profit use authorized others contact the author quarkaz1@msn.com

People Who Love YES! Find Out Why... Subscribe Today

Personal tools