Keystone XL "At a Standstill" After Nebraska Ruling
The Keystone XL pipeline project suffered a major setback this week with a Nebraska court ruling that will likely delay any final decision on the pipeline for at least another six months.
"If we stick together, and if we show that we can outlast all other lobbying and PR campaigns, than it is possible to win."
The District Court judge ruled in favor of three landowners—Randy Thompson, Susan Luebbe, and Susan Dunavan—who challenged a Nebraska law granting Gov. Dave Heineman and state environmental regulators special authority to approve pipeline projects. The governor used this new authority to approve Keystone XL's passage through the state, despite opposition from landowner and environmental groups.
President Obama had been expected to make a decision on the pipeline at some point this summer or later. Now, the already contentious process is on hold. If the pipeline is again approved in Nebraska, it will likely go through a lengthy rerouting process before going back to the president for a final decision.
Dave Domina, the attorney who represented the landowners, said in a news release that the pipeline company TransCanada now "has no approved route in Nebraska. TransCanada is not authorized to condemn the property against Nebraska landowners. The pipeline project is at standstill in this state."
TransCanada's spokesperson, Shawn Howard, told Bloomberg news in an email that "we are disappointed and disagree with the decision," and are deciding what steps to take next.
Jane Kleeb of Bold Nebraska, a citizen advocacy group, was encouraged by the ruling. "This clearly gives a boost to landowners and citizens," she said, groups that had worked to challenge what she called the governor's "illegal process."
The Keystone XL pipeline, which would transport tar sands crude from Alberta to refineries in east Texas, has already been delayed by at least two years—due to legal challenges like this one, but also by a grassroots environmental campaign on a scale not seen since the anti-nuclear protests of the 1970s. Some landowners were particularly vocal in their opposition, noting that tar sands are more likely to spill than regular crude oil and thus pose a greater threat to land and water.
Kleeb hopes that landowners and citizens in other states along the Keystone XL route will take courage from the ruling. "If we stick together, and if we show that we can outlast all other lobbying and PR campaigns, then it is possible to win."
Kristin Moe wrote this article for YES! Magazine, a national, nonprofit media project that fuses powerful ideas and practical actions. Kristin writes about climate, grassroots movements, and social change. Follow her on Twitter @yo_Kmoe.
- A Healing Walk through Canada's Tar Sands Dystopia
- Houston's Most Polluted Neighborhood Draws the Line at Alberta Tar Sands
That means, we rely on support from our readers.
Independent. Nonprofit. Subscriber-supported.