Red State Ranchers Vs. the Pipeline
Video courtesy of BoldNebraska
The proposed Keystone XL Pipeline would carry thousands of gallons of crude oil from the Alberta tar sands across the American Plains every day. Despite claims by developer TransCanada that there is little risk of disastrous environmental impact, opponents of the project are concerned about the potential for contamination of waterways and fragile ecosystems.
In September thousands of people converged on the White House in the largest act of civil disobedience in the history of the U.S. climate movement. The protesters sat-in peacefully and over 1,200 were arrested in protest of the Keystone XL project. Now the movement has gained fierce support from landowners of Nebraska. More than 2,000 people showed up at the Nebraska State Department hearing to say they don't want crude oil running through the delicate Sandhills or the Ogallala aquifer—which supplies water to most of the Midwest.
- Read more about the Nebraska hearings
- Pipeline Risk: Who's Judging?
In its risk assessment, is the State Department just taking the developer of the Keystone XL pipeline at its word?
- Why We Find It So Hard to Act Against Climate Change
Solving the “It’s not my problem” problem. A psychologist on what keeps us from coming to terms with the climate crisis.
- Pipeline Protests: Beyond the Usual Suspects
Can opposition to the Keystone XL pipeline bring conservatives back to conservation?
That means, we rely on support from our readers.
Independent. Nonprofit. Subscriber-supported.