Thursday, June 08, 2006

N. California voters reject corporate personhood

Lots of people talks about the problems of corporate power, but the people of a northern California county are doing something about it.

Voters in Humboldt County on Tuesday adopted "Measure T: the Ordinance to Protect Our Rights to Fair Elections and Local Democracy" by a vote of 55% to 45%. The measure prohibits corporations from outside the county from bankrolling political campaigns.

There are some good reasons the people of Humboldt County are fired up about outside corporate money "meddling" in local politics. In 1999, Wal-Mart put $235,000 behind an effort to site a highly unpopular big box store on the Eureka waterfront (and failed).

Then there was the time Pacific Lumber Company, owned by the Houston-based Maxxam Corporation, got ticked off at Paul Gallegos, then Humboldt's newly elected district attorney. Pacific Lumber, you may remember, is famous for its practice of mowing down ancient redwood forests, spurring many protests, the famous coalition of the Steelworkers and the tree-huggers, and Julia Butterfly Hill's long vigil in the redwood she named Luna. (See what she's up to now here.)

Maxxam spent over $250,000 to run a recall campaign against this D.A. - but lost by a nearly two-to-one margin. Why such a fuss about a district attorney? Evidently Gallegos had thought he ought to enforce the law -- including regulations affecting the corporation. (Gallegos, a supporter of Measure T, was re-elected on Tuesday also.)

What about the constitutional protection of free speech that corporations say give them the right to support, at any scale, the candidates and ballot measures of their choice, anywhere they choose?

Measure T supporters thought of that. The measure makes clear that Humboldt citizens do not believe corporations are legal people. (See Thom Hartmann's excellent piece on how corporations became "persons.") Measure T says only humans have constitutional rights.

This distinction is critical to our prospects on this planet. Publicly traded corporations are required by law to put profit to their shareholders first - before the well-being of employees, customers, their country, clean air or water, or, for that matter, the life-sustaining systems of the planet itself.

Whether it's cutting the last grove of ancient redwoods or driving down wages through outsourcing and union busting -- these activities take on a inexorable logic. As corporations grow to behemoth size and use their mammoth resources to further this single-minded aim, the destruction caused by this profit-at-all-costs ethic is becoming unbearable.

We humans, on the other hand, can weigh complex questions from the perspective of our pocketbooks, our families, our love of the outdoors, our empathy for our neighbors, our sense of right and wrong -- it is that complex balancing act that democracy demands of us.

Humboldt County voters have hit the nail on the head -- it is the responsibility of human beings to weigh the complex questions that are determining our prospects as a human species. Human beings who work for corporations can do that as individual citizens, but corporations -- which are constrained by their requirement to serve shareholders pocketbooks -- cannot.

Here and here are the websites of the Measure T organizers. Also, see John Nichols article from The Nation, "Citizens 1, Corporations 0." And see Liberty Tree's work on taking local democracy to a national level.

2 Comments:

At 2:22 PM, Carlos Beca said...

I am extremelly happy that some voters are taking corporate power seriously and have managed to implement a policy against it. I am sure that this type of atittude is going to spread like dandelions in the next few years because people are finally starting to wake up. Here were I work, not too long ago I had to be careful about what I said because I know that I was labelled a leftist right away, today I do not know of a person that does not talk against corporate power and all the other issues related to it. The Great Turning is actually happening.

 
At 12:09 PM, Jeff Goddin said...

Great news! But surely there will be a challenge in the courts to this anti-corporate result, and we should prepare for it to go all the way to the Supreme Court. That means getting together the resources to support the best lawyers we can find to defend this result against the twisted logic of the corporations and the twisted minds of Republican-appointed judges. DUHC has to realize that it has drawn a line in the sand which is going to antagonize the most powerful entities the world has ever known. Remarkable as this victory is, let's make sure it's not just symbolic. We all need to keep a close eye on this until it has cleared all the legal hurdles and is implemented. Only then can we celebrate. And what a celebration it will be!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home