What MLK taught us about peace
It is tempting after great leaders pass away to focus on the positions they took that are now widely applauded, and to ignore the more challenging stances--those that make us question what we are doing now and make us uncomfortable.
On this national holiday for Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., I reread the speech he made at Riverside Church on April 4, 1967 -- a prophetic speech opposing the continued U.S. involvement in Vietnam. The speech could have been written about Iraq -- one would simply have to substitute "terrorism" for "communism" as the threat used to justify actions that King understood to be morally wrong.
In his speech, King calls for religious leaders to take a stand to end the Vietnam War, but he goes deeper, showing his understanding of the dynamics that continue to create wars today.
"I say we must enter the struggle, but I wish to go on now to say something even more disturbing. The war in Vietnam is but a symptom of a far deeper malady within the American spirit, and if we ignore this sobering reality we will find ourselves organizing clergy- and laymen-concerned committees for the next generation. ... We will be marching ... and attending rallies without end unless there is a significant and profound change in American life and policy."
What is the nature of that sobering reality? Here's more from the Riverside speech:
"In 1957 a sensitive American official overseas said that it seemed to him that our nation was on the wrong side of a world revolution. During the past ten years we have seen emerge a pattern of suppression which now has justified the presence of U.S. military "advisors" in Venezuela. This need to maintain social stability for our investments accounts for the counter-revolutionary action of American forces in Guatemala. It tells why American helicopters are being used against guerrillas in Colombia and why American napalm and green beret forces have already been active against rebels in Peru. It is with such activity in mind that the words of the late John F. Kennedy come back to haunt us. Five years ago he said, "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
"Increasingly, by choice or by accident, this is the role our nation has taken -- the role of those who make peaceful revolution impossible by refusing to give up the privileges and the pleasures that come from the immense profits of overseas investment.The tide of public opinion has turned against the escalation of war in Iraq. With continued pressure from the American people, with some courage among our leadership, we can end the tragic occupation of Iraq. We would do well to learn the lessons King articulated almost 40 years ago, so this time so we don't just end a war, we build a world in which all can live in peace.
"I am convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. We must rapidly begin the shift from a "thing-oriented" society to a "person-oriented" society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered.
"A true revolution of values will soon cause us to question the fairness and justice of many of our past and present policies. ... True compassion is more than flinging a coin to a beggar; it is not haphazard and superficial. It comes to see that an edifice which produces beggars needs restructuring. A true revolution of values will soon look uneasily on the glaring contrast of poverty and wealth. With righteous indignation, it will look across the seas and see individual capitalists of the West investing huge sums of money in Asia, Africa and South America, only to take the profits out with no concern for the social betterment of the countries, and say: "This is not just." It will look at our alliance with the landed gentry of Latin America and say: "This is not just." The Western arrogance of feeling that it has everything to teach others and nothing to learn from them is not just. A true revolution of values will lay hands on the world order and say of war: "This way of settling differences is not just." This business of burning human beings with napalm, of filling our nation's homes with orphans and widows, of injecting poisonous drugs of hate into veins of people normally humane, of sending men home from dark and bloody battlefields physically handicapped and psychologically deranged, cannot be reconciled with wisdom, justice and love. A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.
"America, the richest and most powerful nation in the world, can well lead the way in this revolution of values. There is nothing, except a tragic death wish, to prevent us from reordering our priorities, so that the pursuit of peace will take precedence over the pursuit of war.
....
"We are now faced with the fact that tomorrow is today. We are confronted with the fierce urgency of now. In this unfolding conundrum of life and history there is such a thing as being too late. ... Over the bleached bones and jumbled residue of numerous civilizations are written the pathetic words: "Too late." ...
"We must move past indecision to action. We must find new ways to speak for peace in Vietnam and justice throughout the developing world -- a world that borders on our doors. If we do not act we shall surely be dragged down the long dark and shameful corridors of time reserved for those who possess power without compassion, might without morality, and strength without sight.
"Now let us begin. Now let us rededicate ourselves to the long and bitter -- but beautiful -- struggle for a new world. This is the calling of the sons of God, and our brothers wait eagerly for our response. Shall we say the odds are too great? Shall we tell them the struggle is too hard? Will our message be that the forces of American life militate against their arrival as full men, and we send our deepest regrets? Or will there be another message, of longing, of hope, of solidarity with their yearnings, of commitment to their cause, whatever the cost? The choice is ours, and though we might prefer it otherwise we must choose in this crucial moment of human history."



2 Comments:
This article and speech along with many others, clearly shows that our Goverment is making the same miscalculations in Iraq as in the past. We the people, need to be come more responsible for our future, by getting active in politics, possibly getting a grass roots third party started. This will be a slow process, but it seems the only answer. Washington has proven that they are not capable of having all our best interests in mind, just "K" Street!
Thank you for reviving these still relevant words of one of the great leaders of our time. Your last statement about not only ending this war, but creating a world that is more beautiful to be in echoes the work being done by Yes! Magazine, which is always a relief to read.
Making this into a world worth bringing children into is a common ideal, but many people feel incapable. We don't know where to start or whether it will make a difference. Highlighting positive stories is a part of the cure, as well as the popular education movement that gives people opportunities and guidance and a forum for taking control of and improving their lives. Here are some sites that link to some popular education resources. I hope they are inspiring. This movement in the states seems to have begun at the Highlander Center in TN, and is spreading. http://www.catalystcentre.ca/Mapping/mapindex.htm
http://www.peopleseducation.org/resource/organizations.htm
Post a Comment
<< Home