Money, Politics, and Saving Our Democracy Banner

Sections
Home » Issues » Climate Solutions » Ecuador: Protecting Diverse Forests and Peoples

Get a FREE Issue. Yes! I want to try YES! Magazine

Nonprofit. Independent. Subscriber-supported. DONATE. How you can support our work.

YES! by Email
Join over 78,000 others already signed up for FREE YES! news.
[SAMPLE]

Town Hall Sidebar

The YES! ChicoBag(R). Full-size tote that fits in your pocket!

 

Ecuador: Protecting Diverse Forests and Peoples

Read this article in Spanish. Lea este artículo en español

 

Photo courtesy SOS Yasuni, www.sosyasuni.org
Campaigners of SOS Yasuni spell the words LIVE YASUNI in the Yasuni National Park. For updates and more details on the plans to protect Yasuni see www.sosyasuni.org. Photo courtesy SOS Yasuni.

Rafael Correa won the Ecuadorian presidency on the strength of his promises to deliver much-needed social programs to his country’s largely impoverished population. He also pledged to protect Ecuador’s natural heritage of biodiversity. Add to this political mix a lot of foreign debt and a billion or more barrels of oil located under a UNESCO bioreserve in the Ecuadorian Amazon, and it’s clear why some observers saw the nation as caught in a classic stalemate between development and environment.

Now, though, the ITT oil fields—located within Yasuní National Park, one of the world’s most biodiverse places and home to a number of indigenous communities—have become an experiment in the possibility of having it both ways.

In May 2007, Correa proposed a unique solution: if the international community will agree to pay or excuse debt worth $350 million annually for 10 years (half the anticipated value of the oil) to help fund sustainable development in Ecuador, then the oil, the forests, and the indigenous groups threatened by the encroachment of oil companies will all be left alone.

It’s a proposal that many are taking seriously. In addition to the danger posed to biodiversity and indigenous rights, development of the ITT fields would be a climate change disaster, generating an estimated 436 million tons of CO2 and destroying a huge swath of tropical rainforest crucial to sequestering carbon and regulating weather patterns.

Though the Bali climate agreement endorsed the importance of forest preservation, it failed to safeguard against the transformation of forests into internationally traded and managed “carbon sinks” that would exclude indigenous people and traditional livelihoods from their borders. Ecuador’s example may point toward a way to protect forests without compromising a future that values equity and human rights.


Brooke Jarvis wrote this article as part of Stop Global Warming Cold, the Spring 2008 issue of YES! Magazine. Brooke is a YES! editorial assistant. Photo of Brooke Jarvis
spacer

 

Si! en espanol logo

Lea este artículo en español ::
Read this article in Spanish

Email Signup
Climate Solutions
Comment on this article

How to add a commentCommenting Policy

comments powered by Disqus


You won’t see any commercial ads in YES!, in print or on this website.
That means, we rely on support from our readers.

||   SUBSCRIBE    ||   GIVE A GIFT   ||   DONATE   ||
Independent. Nonprofit. Subscriber-supported.




Subscribe

Personal tools