Opinion Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the author/producer’s interpretation of facts and data.
A few weeks ago I wrote a post about using social media to advance the climate conversation. It was the lite, individual action approach to dealing with a behemoth problem. What’s the upstream approach? Burn it all down. Or at least break it up into itty bitty pieces no greater than the size of Mark Zuckerberg’s sunblock-shellacked head.
The deep wisdom of this Kevin Roose piece, given the result of the U.S. election, should give us all a fright. Roose has been steadfastly sounding the alarm about Facebook’s content skew for years: Far-right content and misinformation pervade by a huge, huge margin. On any given day, you can expect an 80-20 or 90-10 split between far-right and center/left sites. As my friend recently asked, what’s a Bongino? IDK! The far right is eating everyone else’s lunch, and breakfast, and dinner. And all their snacks, too. It doesn’t matter that Biden spent 8 to 1 on digital advertising if right-leaning lies are 1 million to 1 in the other direction.
I’m not giving people who voted for Trump a free pass, but a look at what millions of people consume for hours a day on their socials provides some perspective. When combined with the robustness of right-leaning talk radio airwaves, we are seeing endless troughs of what I’d charitably call low-information content. It’s a deep sowing of untruths that can’t be uprooted with a few newspaper articles that debunk the lies. And it’s why a lot of the media analysis in the wake of this election seems off to me. THIS is the story. It all comes from here. This is where people get their information, bake it into their worldview, and serve it up to their friends and families and Facebook feeds. It’s horrible for the future prospects of a truth-based world. And it’s terrible for climate.
Like Roose, I’m a little obsessed with CrowdTangle. I use their climate tool to get a bead on what people are saying or not saying about the crisis on Facebook. It’s a sobering lens. People are not saying much. And when they do talk, there’s both deeply insubstantial and inaccurate content. It’s a giant pile of yikes.
How do we solve this? Sharing good content on our personal accounts isn’t enough. Reading it again now, it’s hard not to agree even more with Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes’ breakup Facebook feature from last year. While there’s some hope that Biden will regulate Big Tech, and make it accountable/liable for content on their platform (!!!), it’s not one of his top four priorities. That said, by all indications, he’ll go much harder on tech than previous administrations. But I worry that we’re up against a tsunami of tstupidity. Sandbagging one outlet helps only so much.
Conservatives who don’t like the slightly increased fact-checking on Facebook and Twitter are switching to sites such as Parler and Newsmax, where they can post misinformation with abandon. Which is why regulating Big Tech is less of a panacea, and more of a wee start in our quest to lance the lies.
What to read
• Check out Influence Map’s damning report on the ubiquity of climate misinformation on Facebook.
• Read Emily Atkin’s work on FB’s climate disinformation.
• Read Elizabeth Warren’s breakup piece, and sign her petition.
• Read this excellent piece about the Facebook climate misinformation loophole and the verdict on their climate hub.
What to do
• Sign this open letter to Facebook asking them to take a stand against climate denial groups.
• Contact Facebook to tell them how you feel.
• Contact Facebook’s media team to tell them how you feel.
• Write to your elected leaders and tell them to advocate for checks on Big Tech.
THIS WEEK: SOCIAL ENGINEERING
What do you think about the spray of spurious social? LMK!
LAST WEEK: Positive-ish
Writes lovely Kathryn:
Two more reasons for hope: there are two Senate runoffs in Georgia in January. Georgia has Stacey Abrams to help organize and GOTV.
Overwhelmingly, Americans support better climate policies (like 70-30). We just have really bad messaging and the deniers have a lot of money to throw around bad info. It’s the same with health care. Apparently Democrats’ policies are really popular, but the Republicans still win because they scare people to death…
I wrote a comic on food waste for Yes! If food waste were a country, it’d be the third-largest emitter. Food for thought!
I’m looking for test audiences (in Canada) for a pilot project on climate communications. It’s a 45-minute talk designed for groups of seven to 15 people, delivered online. Do you have a group that might like to participate? Your knitting club or Harry Styles fan club? Your grandmother’s pickleball club? Participants don’t need to know anything about climate. We’re expressly looking for people who feel they don’t know enough and want to know and do more. It’s free and fun and not too depressing, I promise! Message me for more information! Thank you.
Is it weird that I want Harry Styles’ pants?
Have a wonderful weekend!
P.S. Does this newsletter go to your junk mail? Please drag it from promotions to your primary inbox!
P.P.S. My husband always generously proofs my newsletter for typos and idiocies. Check out his newsletter today. He writes about the wonderful poet Kate Baer, who I’d never heard of.
P.P.P.S. As always, LMK me how I can make it better! Is it too long? too first-persony? too momjeansy? I’d like to mix it up, so please share.
P.P.P.P.S. This is my newsletter for the week of Nov. 13, 2020, published in partnership with YES! Media. You can sign up to get Minimum Viable Planet newsletter emailed directly to you at https://mvp.substack.com/.
Sarah Lazarovic is an award-winning artist, creative director, freelance animator and filmmaker, and journalist, covering news and cultural events in comic form. She is the author of A Bunch of Pretty Things I Did Not Buy.